State Emblem of India
RTI oversightDepartment of Personnel & Training · Central Information Commission
Q1 FY 2026-27

How the Act performed this quarter

1 April to 30 June 2026. Every figure below is traceable to the requests it came from.

Requests filed3.42 L+8.1% on Q4
Answered within 30 days71%-3.4 pts
First appeals28,910+14.2%
Second appeals to CIC4,182+21.6%

On-time answering by authority

Filed, answered within the statutory period, and appeal rate

AuthorityFiledOn timeAppeals
Meeting threshold3
Department of Posts
31,20488%6.1%
Ministry of Railways
48,77176%9.4%
Department of Personnel & Training
12,86074%11.2%
Needs attention3
Ministry of Home AffairsWatch
22,41561%17.8%
Department of RevenueWatch
19,33858%19.1%
Ministry of Housing & Urban AffairsEscalate
9,10244%26.5%

What refusals were based on

Share of all refusals this quarter

Section 8(1)(j) — personal information34%

Overturned on appeal in 41% of cases. The commonest bad refusal.

Section 8(1)(d) — commercial confidence19%

Third-party notice under Section 11 recorded in only 28% of these.

“Information not maintained”17%

Not a ground under the Act. Section 6(3) transfer was made in 12% of these.

Section 8(1)(a) — sovereignty and security11%

Concentrated in three ministries.

Section 9 — infringes copyright6%

Overturned in 52% of appeals.

Other and unstated13%

No section cited at all — itself an appealable defect.

Appeals and penalties

First appeals decided within 45 days63%

First appeals where the CPIO was overruled38%

Second appeals pending before the CIC22,704

Median CIC disposal time14 months

Section 20 penalties imposed184

Penalty exposure at ₹250/day, unpaid₹2.31 Cr

Penalty exposure is Section 20 arithmetic at ₹250 a day on recorded delays, capped at ₹25,000 per case. It is not a demand.

How 100 requests move

Answered without appeal71%
Went to first appeal8.5%
Reached the Commission1.2%

Each step down the ladder costs the citizen months and the office its record.

What needs a direction this quarter

Direction requiredHousing & Urban Affairs: 26.5% appeal rate, 44% on-time

Three of eleven CPIOs account for 61% of the delays. Recommend a written direction under Section 19(8)(a) and CPIO retraining before the next quarter.

Direction required“Not maintained in this office” used 58,000 times

Used without a Section 6(3) transfer in 88% of instances. This is a procedural failure, not a refusal ground, and it is the single largest driver of avoidable appeals.

Monitor this quarter48-hour life-and-liberty requests: 22% missed

417 requests flagged under the Section 7(1) proviso were answered late. Recommend automatic escalation to the Nodal Officer at hour 24.

Monitor this quarterCIC backlog grows faster than disposal

Second appeals rose 21.6% while disposals rose 4%. At the current rate the median wait reaches 19 months by FY 2027-28.

What this view depends on

01Point-by-point replies

Refusal grounds can only be counted if the CPIO records them against a point. Scanned letters produce no data.

02Deadlines computed, not reported

The system runs the clock, so on-time rates are observed instead of self-declared in an annual return.

03Appeal outcomes linked back

When an FAA or the Commission overrules a ground, that outcome attaches to the ground that failed.